From review set to privilege log,
every call carries its citation.
This page replays the privilege-review pattern from our legal track. Documents come in, each one gets a privilege call with the basis cited to the source text, and draft log entries land in an attorney's queue for approval. Document names and confidence scores below are representative; the pipeline shape is what we ship.
A simulated pipeline run reviews document DOC-004182, an email between a general counsel and an executive. It passes ingest, classification, privilege analysis, and log drafting, then routes to the withhold queue with a draft log entry pending attorney approval. Six more documents are then triaged in the queue below.
Seven documents in. Three routes out.
Documents with no privilege basis are queued to produce. Clear attorney-client or work-product calls are withheld with a draft log entry attached. Anything mixed or low-confidence goes to an attorney with the relevant passages highlighted. Nothing is withheld or produced without an attorney's sign-off.
Confidence thresholds here are illustrative. In an engagement they are set with your supervising attorney and proven against an eval set drawn from your own matters.
Classification is automated. Privilege calls are routed with their evidence.
Citation-grounded calls
Every privilege call cites the passage it rests on: who asked for advice, which counsel answered, what makes it work product. A call that cannot produce a defensible citation is routed to a person instead of being made.
Drafted privilege logs
Withheld documents arrive with a draft log entry in your format: date, author, recipients, privilege basis, description. Attorneys edit and approve, and every edit feeds the eval set that tunes the next run.
Approval gates + audit
Every withhold and every production clears an attorney. Every decision writes a packet: the document, the cited passages, the call, and who approved it. The trail is built for meet-and-confer disputes and malpractice review.
Run this on your review set.
Tell us your matter profile, your current review spend, and the citation-match number that would prove this works. We respond in two business days with a scoped proposal.